Because these domestic partnerships are not actually marriages, despite the appropriation of the label; there is no intelligible basis in them for the norms of monogamy, exclusivity, and the pledge of permanence that structure and help to define marriage as historically understood in our law and culture. Of course, many people’s understanding of, and authentic commitment to, these norms has already eroded substantially since the 1960s under the pressure of sexual-revolution ideology....And the erosion of these beliefs (and practices in line with them) will further wound our communities — especially mothers, children, and the poor.
-Robert George, Princeton Professor of Politics

0 Response to "Robert George on Gay "Marriage" in New York"